] dvb-usb: no frontend was attached by 'Microsoft Xbox One Digital TV Tuner' ] mn88472 1-0018: Panasonic MN88472 successfully identified ] dvbdev: dvb_create_media_entity: media entity 'dvb-demux' registered. ] dvbdev: DVB: registering new adapter (Microsoft Xbox One Digital TV Tuner) ] dvb-usb: will pass the complete MPEG2 transport stream to the software demuxer. ] dvb-usb: found a 'Microsoft Xbox One Digital TV Tuner' in warm state. What i see is it's trying to use the same driver ( dvb_usb_dib0700) that was working on LE 8.2.5 but on 8.95 no way, tvh shows no connector available: ![]() I just tryed latest LE release 8.95.003 for amlogic device from your annuncement, but still no luck. I can confirm mine also is working ootb on LE 8.2.5 My Xbox One DVB stick works ootb, what image do you use ? Is there a step by step guide for doing this involving getting the minimal amount of components etc and then subsequent configuration? I do remember there being a "bit of a faff" about logging into the TVHeadend server remotely and then setting it up but I wonder if all this has now been streamlined? If the above is not possible, since I was using TVHeadend, is this still the preferred option for live TV/PVR? Although I configured my Kodi 17 setup about 18 months ago, I don't recall the exact steps for getting the live TV up and running. Should it be possible to install the correct one and then commence tuning etc without having to install something like TVHeadend? I notice it has some DVB drivers that can be installed. So, can Kodi 18 handle DVB adaptors natively these days? i.e. I installed this to a separate USB drive and tried a few things out but it appeared that Kodi 18 wasn't liking the Xbox DVB tuner out of the box. I downloaded the beta yesterday as I was interested in the retrogaming/netflix/whether the DVB experience has been improved. Someone is paying something, somehow.I'm currently running Libreelec with Kodi 17 and have an Xbox One DVB adaptor for live telly. It is just an economic model that allows the airline to exist by creating an average revenue value for the entire plane. You cannot "justify" why the guy sitting next to you on a plane paid either half or twice what you did. In which situations you need to pay is something we define as some subset of the functionality and service we provide. Basically, the people paying are subsidizing or paying for the people who are not. The economic reality is that we have to charge for some forms of usage of the system or the system cannot exist. The web client will not function in the same way but, again, you keep asking for specific justification and I've already explained that. ^ would be nice to finally point the difference, that justifies the monitary difference, what all this here is about and stop generalizing and trying to make the "stingy" users bad feelings Just that you "correct" now your fault by randomly redefining what is a "website" and/or what is an "app", does not give it any sense nor changes the situation of inequality The same thing is the same thing, it's pretty clear here ![]() As I said previously, we should change this to be by platform instead of "app". The reality is that that is an arbitrary distinction so we need to redefine how we present this with respect to our feature matrix. You have chosen to view "the web app" as a particular thing and this is really our fault because we defined it that way. It is all Emby and many pieces of Emby's technical implementation are the same in many different apps and platforms (and some are different by necessity). However, in our context, at some level it is all "the same thing". Happens all the time in a number of normal contexts (airline seats, taxi rides, theme park tickets, user software licenses vs. First, it is not necessarily all that uncommon for different usages of "the same thing" to cost different amounts. The issue here is your perception of "the same thing". The other way around is the case, the unequal treatment for the same thing was just extended againĪnd now "forced" users to pay for something, while others can continue using it for free No one here asked to get any "discount" or anythig free that costed money before or even about the costs itself
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |